Monday, March 22, 2010

i aught to beat the shit out of this person..

seriously. there is no defending this. these "shorts" are $48. don't you dare tell me you think these are "kinda cute" or "maybe if i was 16" or "they're just so sweet". this is bullshit is what it is.





48 dollars. for a gigantic camel toe. and diaper ass. this is what chicks wore under their sack dresses on the fucking prairie. we are not paying to look like this. no. we are not.


sigh. from this etsy shop.

41 comments:

1x1000 said...

You cRaCK me up! Yeah they are hidious! But SOMEBODY Somewhere will have that shit on thinking they are cute!

L said...

I am rolling! They look like they are some undies from back in the day. I wouldnt dare buy these.

Raina Cox said...

Bloomers!

U R doin' it wrong.

suburban prep said...

Wouldn't be caught in those.

boops said...

oh dear...wrong for so many reasons!!!!

susan said so said...

I wonder if they're meant to be worn with this lovely item from the same shop: http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=43163829

Seriously? Not even as pajamas!

xox,
Susan

AppleTree said...

Gah! just because you can sew, it doesn't make you a designer people, those a fugly.

Katie said...

i also enjoy the hair hanging down to her waist. is that from her head or her armpits?

The Townhouselady said...

HEINOUS!

These wouldn't even look cute on my 4 week old daughter and she makes a mustard-poop covered bum look adorable!

Matt said...

ya know some people might dig on the pentecostal chic look. and yes, that is one big fucking camel toe. maybe that's why them brithces is so big. good find!

seriously though, somebody out there has to have these... in multiple colors.

jennifer said...

i'm so creeped out now!

Beach Vintage said...

This is funny, I can always rely on my Jen for a laugh.

Prince Edward Bonethrobber said...

Oh Honey!!! You can't doodle a descending snake with an overbite worth a shit! You forgot the eyeball, dammit! The eyeball!!!

Bailey@ peppermintbliss said...

It's like they come with poo already in them...

domestikatedlife said...

They're perfect!

(For my American Girl doll)

Aubre said...

if you think those are fucked up, check out this etsy site. so sooo wrong

http://www.etsy.com/shop/SugarMonkies

Keri Batchelder Hoffman said...

As I was scrolling down I thought, camel toe? Then I scrolled some more, yep, camel toe. Yuk.

sherri said...

I particularly find the bow and the choice of stockings to pair with the fugliest shorts ever, hideously criminal

Caroline said...

Maybe if I were 80...

and blind.

Kerry said...

bloody hell that made me laugh and wonder what poor demented person I'll see them on next summer in australia!

Jessica said...

she's wearing my freaking shower cap on her bits - this is so many shades of wrong!

Anonymous said...

Y R so funny!

Room Service ~ Decorating 101 said...

I have a headache and you are making me laugh... too funny.

ModFruGal said...

Wow....that's some serious fugly...sick and wrong. My word verification is SPLETH...I think that describes it well.

Oonafey said...

Just wrong...

The Countess of Nassau County said...

I thank you.

sketch42 said...

Hun, there is some serious crap being sold out there in the shorts department. Did you see that hideous pair of harem shorts I posted about?

They look like what my kids pants look like after she sleeps in her pee all night and then makes doody in there too.

FN horrible.

nameisgrace said...

what are you talking about? these are so hot right now.


lmao! soooo hideous! you crack me up beyond belief.

Dumbwit Tellher said...

Loving how your mind works....wholly crotch rockets.

Josephine Tale Peddler said...

I don't know. I think you would look cute in them. Thanks for the laugh today. xx

Sister Wolf said...

And with those tights, yet! As if!

A-M said...

Hubby and I have never laughed so much since we discovered your Design Tard series! Brilliant observations...A-M xx

nkp said...

Oh, and I thought maybe you bought them and there would be an accompanying video. Shoot, I was so looking forward to it! You know, for educational purposes. ;0)

Tiina said...

haha

Lolo said...

We saw some stuff like those in Philly last week and my 13 year old tried them on. Yeah, I paid her but that's not the point.

Those would work on a one year old cuz the diaper would block the cameltoe.

camdesign said...

Do not show this to the Karl's out there... this is just what he would put the super skinny girls in on the runway... and call it edgy...huh...edgy...huh (with an accent).
I was not kidding...have you seen the sh*t they want us to buy lately, sad very sad....

The Boese Family said...

You friggin' crack me up! I definitely know the blog to come to when I need a laugh. Thanks!

Kimberly Knoess said...

There is no figure that those shorts would flatter! I agree - ugly as crap!

susie q said...

Those would be adorable on a pudgy 8-month-old. But anyone else? Nope. I love it when you speak truth to power.

Anonymous said...

Oh, good Lord. I don't even know a child who would be caught dead in those hideous Pampers-hiding pantaloonish cartoonish what-the-hell-evers. -- HollyM

Kirsten said...

Marked the price up to 54 buckaroos. The nerve.

~Kirsten
http://triplemaxtons.blogspot.com